MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995565811

Optimizing Reinforcement Learning: Fog and Edge Resource Management Through Bootstrapping and Reward Shaping

2023· dissertation· en· W6995565811 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesConcordia University
KeywordsServerReinforcement learningResource management (computing)Task (project management)Edge computingResource (disambiguation)Service (business)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionResource allocationQuality of serviceBootstrapping (finance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid and extensive use of technology is unprecedented. From small devices like sensors and mobile phones to large systems like servers and data centers, a wide range of computing setups exists to meet human needs. However, the increased demand has raised concerns about whether these setups can handle the load. Fog and edge computing are concepts that bring servers closer to users to improve response time and service quality. But the availability of these fog devices is limited, highlighting the need for systems to manage computing resources. These systems' main task is to efficiently distribute services across available resources and adapt to changing needs. Existing resource management solutions still possess challenges and limitations with regards to the quality of decisions due to their increasing complexity. \n \nIn this thesis, our main motivation is leveraging AI in addressing resource management, which stems from its ability to intelligently handle complex and dynamic scenarios, such as optimizing service placement, predicting demands, and adapting to changing environments. AI's capacity to learn from data and make informed decisions offers a promising approach to efficiently manage computing resources in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. This research is motivated by four main goals: (1) creating a strong computing architecture that can meet diverse user needs across various applications managed by a resource management system; (2) using AI to develop resource management solutions that handle decisions like placement and scaling, as well as predict user demands and resource availability; (3) ensuring the AI solution is reliable despite potential errors by improving its performance or having a backup plan; (4) making the AI solution adaptable to sudden environmental changes to keep decisions effective. \n \nThe thesis aims to address these gaps by: (1) designing an effective networking and computing architecture in the context of on-demand fog and edge formation, while supporting an Intelligent Computing Resource Management solution (ICRM) for multi-types of applications through offline learning and bootstrapping; (2) using DRL to build the ICRM, driven by a Markov Decision Process (MDP) environment design that produces actions related to host selection and service placement while accounting for the change in user demands; (3) enhancing the proposed MDP by adding the support for predicting the change in both user demands and available computing resources, where the agent becomes capable for issues horizontal and vertical resource scaling decisions in multi-applications setting; (4) introducing the first solution to speed the learning speed of DRL agent by devising a Graph Convolutional Network solution as a potential-based reward shaping solution; (5) developing another reward shaping solution based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) carefully designed and inspired by the value iteration network (VIN), to speed learning. Besides these contributions, we present a set of experimental studies and simulations using real-world test cases for each of the contributions compared to state-of-the-art solutions. \n \nIn conclusion, this thesis identifies research gaps that warrant further exploration in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207