O enfermeiro em reabilitação gerontológica: um marco conceitual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo constitui-se uma pesquisa teorica que discute a enfermagem em reabilitacao gerontologica, atraves das realidades encontradas nos Estados Unidos; Franca; Canada e Brasil. Foi realizado atraves da compilacao de artigos de periodicos cientificos indexados, em bases de dados que contemplam registros franceses, canadenses, americanos e brasileiros, no periodo compreendido entre 1966 a 2000, enfocando a enfermagem em reabilitacao gerontologica. Tendo como finalidade a organizacao do conhecimento existente, para o atendimento em enfermagem em reabilitacao gerontologica baseado nas evidencias teoricas e adaptado as necessidades de cada tipo de servico. Realizou-se o processo de analise dos conteudos, por meio da categorizacao dos mesmos. Ao final da analise, pode-se concluir que a funcao do enfermeiro em reabilitacao e : de educador; treinador para atividades que afetam a vida na sociedade; avaliador de incapacidades, promotor da prevencao de incapacidades e dos altos gastos com servicos de Saúde. Necessita-se de mais investigacoes acerca da realidade das funcoes desempenhadas pelo enfermeiro brasileiro na reabilitacao do idoso
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".