MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995578652

On PCF Polynomials

2024· other· en· W6995578652 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicKruppel-like factors research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegree (music)Conjugacy classBounded functionMonic polynomialPolynomialDifference polynomialsSet (abstract data type)Macdonald polynomials
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author of [27] proves that the set of post-critically finite (PCF) polynomials of given degree is a set of bounded height, up to PGL_2-conjugacy. This result is extended to show that the set of monic polynomials g(z) with rational coefficients of given degree such that there exists a d ≥ 2 such that g(z^d) is PCF, is also a set of bounded height. Note that by fixing the degree of a polynomial and algebraic degree of its coefficients, the set of such PCF polynomials is in fact finite, and computable. Bounds on the coefficients for quartic PCF polynomials with rational coefficients are computed, and a search of the resulting space yields 16 distinct conjugacy classes. Infinite families of PCF polynomials containing each of these distinct conjugacy classes are found, giving a lower bound on the number of such conjugacy classes in terms of degree d.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicKruppel-like factors researchFrench-language works237,207