MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995602193

Organisation et dynamiques de l’occupation du sol au nord-ouest de Cenabum-Orléans (Loiret) du ier s. av. n. è. au ve s. de n. è.

2024· article· en· W6995602193 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementQuarter (Canadian coin)Rural settlementSettlement (finance)Work (physics)Documentation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work deals with the organization of the countryside to the northwest of the agglomeration of Orléans (Loiret) during the Roman period, from 1st century BC to the 5th century AD It is based on data from documentation about rural settlements surveyed, diagnosed or excavated. The area studied includes the northwest quarter of the territory of the commune of Orléans and seven other contiguous communes: Cercottes, Fleury-les-Aubrais, Gidy, Ingré, Ormes, Saint-Jean-de-la-Ruelle, Saran.Criteria for prioritizing these sites were established using archaeological and environmental descriptors. A classification of 43 sites was obtained using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). Despite its dependence on the quality of information available upstream, it defines five classes of housing, ranging from the villa to more modest settlements.These results were compared with the distribution of settlement and its density. The structure of the sowing of points, highlighted using exploratory spatial analyses, shows grouped sites, the distances of the groupings having however not been able to be defined. Would a larger corpus and a wider study window have made it possible to overcome the pitfalls undoubtedly due to too few sites and, thus, to push the interpretations further here?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207