Participatory Justice in a Global Economy : the New Rule of Law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice hosted a\nnational Conference on Participatory Justice in a Global Economy: The\nNew Rule of Law? in Banff, Alberta, from October 16th to the 18th, 2003.\nThe Co-Chairs for the Conference were Dean Patricia Hughes from the\nLaw School of the University of Calgary, the Honourable Justice\nRosemary Nation from the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta and Mr.\nMichael I. Wylie from Macleod Dixon LLP in Calgary. The Honourable\nJustice Constance D. Hunt from the Alberta Court of Appeal, Professor\nL. Philip Bryden from the Faculty of Law of the University of British\nColumbia, Professor Patrick A. Molinari from the Faculty of Law of the\nUniversité de Montréal and Ms. Christine Huglo Robertson, Executive\nDirector of the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice were\nalso members of the Planning Committee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".