Piano Writing of Henri Duparc: A Study Focused on Feuilles Volantes, op.1, and the accompaniment in selected Mélodies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce travail s'intéresse à l'écriture pianistique du compositeur français Henri Duparc, au travers deson cycle de jeunesse méconnu de pièces pour piano, Feuilles volantes, opus 1, et del'accompagnement de piano dans une sélection de mélodies: L’invitation au voyage, La vague etla cloche, et Phidylé. L'origine et la nature de l'écriture pianistique de Duparc sont retracéesgrâce à l'étude d'exemples musicaux pertinents, mis en regard avec des extraits prischez des compositeurs plus anciens, ainsi que chez ses contemporains. L'analyse de l'harmonie etde la texture des pièces choisies, tant dans leur version pour piano que pour orchestre, révèle laspécificité du traitement mélodique chez Duparc, et son approche singulière des parties de piano.D'autres genres, tels que le poème symphonique et l'opéra, sont examinés, au titre de sourcesd'inspiration potentielles. Les pianistes qui souhaiteraient enrichir leurs perspectivesd'interprétation des accompagnements des mélodies de Duparc trouveront, dans les découvertes révélées par ces analyses, la suggestion de nouveaux enjeux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".