MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995752549

Pohádky pro zlobivé strašidýlko

2012· article· cs· W6995752549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVědecká knihovna v Olomouci (Research Library in Olomouc) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Sequence (biology)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A koho že strašidýlko zlobí? No maminku Bílou paní a tatínka Bezhlavého rytíře, se kterými bydlí na starém opuštěném hradě. A je tak neposedné, že maminka s ním má spoustu starostí a trápení. Strašidýlko si celý den jen poletuje po lesích, sklepeních nebo kolem cimbuří a večer celé rozdováděné nechce usnout. Maminka proto požádá starého netopýra Alberta, aby strašidýlku vyprávěl krátké pohádky na dobrou noc. A tak se malý strašidlácký kluk před spaním dozví, jak to bylo s tlustou vílou, co za trampoty měl ohniváček, kterak dopadl mlsný hejkal, proč křepelky volají pět peněz a mnoho dalších příběhů. A spolu s ním se to mohou dozvědět i vaše děti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.318
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVědecká knihovna v Olomouci (Research Library in Olomouc)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207