Policy Convergence, Disconnect, and Silence: A Case Study on the Framings and Impacts of Internationalization on the Experiences of International MPA Students in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: I am a white settler who grew up in rural Saskatchewan. Since 2009, I have been employed at the University of Saskatchewan (USask) in a student support position with the Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy.\nProblem of Practice: The framing of internationalization has come under scrutiny as it relates to international student recruitment, and several scholars are calling for a reframing towards a more ethical form of internationalization that is not dominated by a strategic or competitive discourse. Further, recent research indicates that contrary to what federal and provincial internationalization strategies suggest, international students are not transitioning seamlessly into desired employment in Canada upon degree completion, and there is a gap in supports to assist this transition. To address this gap, there is a need for additional research to allow institutions to better understand the experiences of international students and to implement change and support where needed to assist in this transition.\nPurpose: This study provides a voice for international Master of Public Administration (MPA) students on their experiences in Canada. The research is interpretive and examines how narratives within policy documents are presented in addition to examining how the framing impacts international MPA students during their study and upon degree completion. The research is also exploratory as it provides practical recommendations for how post-secondary institutions can support graduate students, both during their program and upon degree completion, including the transition into employment in their field of study. The overarching question that guides the research is how are the framings of internationalization within the Canadian, Saskatchewan, and USask internationalization strategies impacting the experiences of international MPA graduate student during and upon degree completion? \nMethods: The Problem of Practice took a policy evaluation approach using a qualitative case study methodology with the methods of document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and researcher memos.\nFindings: There are three overarching findings from the document analysis of the internationalization strategies – policy convergence: strategic framing; policy disconnect: student to labourer to resident; and policy silence: lack of anti-oppressive themes and Indigenous Peoples. The findings from the interviews include a logic model that outlines the experiences of international MPA students in Canada, highlighting the importance of the Executive Internship program for employment transition, the need for a wide range of programing and supports to assist the diverse group of students entering the program, and the importance of providing education on Indigenous Peoples in Canada. The findings from the strategies were then compared to the interviews, which resulted in several implications.\nPractice Implications of Inquiry: Implications to theory include the use of social cartographies to expand the logic model framework to pay attention to the unintended outcomes of internationalization. Implications to educational leadership include utilizing guiding question in strategy development that takes into consideration the goals of international students and the voices and history of Indigenous Peoples in Canada. Implications to practice include incorporating recommendations from international students and utilizing theories of change to identify questions to consider within MPA programming and supports. Implications for research draw attention to the policy silence around Anti-Oppressive themes and Indigenous Peoples in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".