Poster Session - Stories of occupation and parental separation: Narrative accounts of adolescents and young adults whose parents divorced or separated
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Through this research we sought to explore the changes in meaningful occupation surrounding parental divorce or separation for adolescents and young adults. Adolescence is a time of growth and transition in its own right, a time when roles change and occupations are explored. Parental separation or divorce may quickly and dramatically change one’s roles and one’s access or opportunity to participate in meaningful or desired occupations. In their own words, young adults shared their stories of parental divorce or separation, focusing on the role of occupation within this time of change.\nMethods: Narrative interviews were conducted with 6 participants. The transcripts were then reviewed and re-ordered to create a ‘storied version’ of the participant’s experience. The participant and researcher then reviewed the ‘storied version’ together and discussed salient points along with further information or corrections. Each story was analysed thematically on its own, and then all stories were analysed together to understand global themes that emerged.\nResults: Results indicate varied utility for engagement in occupations for the participants. Participants use occupation to cope and move forward, and participate in occupations to assume their new roles and expectations, among other findings.\nContributions: This study explores the vast role of occupation in the prevalent phenomenon of parental divorce in Canada. While often linked to other clinical matters, divorce itself is not often explored in its own right as a contributor to potential hardships, issues, or even opportunities for growth for adolescents and young adults. Additionally, this study furthers the use of narrative methods to explore the role of occupations and the intricate contexts of occupational disruption. Finally, this study explores the acquisition and adaptation of occupations in adolescents, a group not often explored in a health context, as they tend to have low rates of morbidity. In studying the occupational participation patterns of adolescents, we may be able to better understand how humans choose and hone their occupational preferences throughout life.\nKey Words: divorce, adolescent, narrative
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".