Physiological and morphological responses of lettuce plants under sole and combination of red, blue, and amber LEDs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
s -1 with 22.6 g FM.The amber grown plants resulted in 33.3 % more yield than the next closet wavelength (red) at the same irradiance level and resulted in 1.7 times more yield than the blue at the same irradiance level.Lettuce plants grown under amber wavelength were photosaturated, and significant photobleaching occurred, an irradiance level above 1000 mol m -2 s -1 .Plants were photosaturated, but not photobleached, when grown under red light with an irradiance level above 1000 mol m -2 s -1 .Plants under blue and RBA light did not reach photosaturation, even with irradiance above 1200 mol m -2 s -1 , suggesting that blue light may inhibit plant growth compared to amber and red light.Supply of amber light resulted in significantly higher yield of lettuce than red, blue and the RBA combination light, but the biological mechanism of the plant use of amber light is unknown at this time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".