MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995857584

Precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters : combined three-phase results of the sudbury neutrino observatory

2012· dissertation· en· W6995857584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar neutrinoNeutrino oscillationNeutrinoSolar neutrino problemMeasurements of neutrino speedNeutrino detectorObservatoryOscillation (cell signaling)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory has successfully demonstrated neutrino flavour transformation in the neutrinos produced in the Sun.The use of heavy water as the detection medium allowed a measurement of both the total active solar neutrino flux and the pure electron neutrino component.This work presents the results of a neutrino oscillation analysis of the latest combined analysis of all phases of the experiment, aiming to obtain the most precise measurement of the neutrino mixing parameters relevant for solar neutrinos.The results obtained show a precision on tan 2 12 better than 10% both on a two and three flavour analysis of all solar neutrino data.A three-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis combining the results of all solar neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment yielded m 2 21 = (7.41+0.21 -0.19 ) 10 -5 eV 2 , tan 2 12 = 0.446 +0.030 -0.029 , and sin 2 13 = (2.5 +1.8 -1.5 ) 10 -2 , which implies an upper bound of sin 2 13 < 0.053 at the 95% confidence level (C.L.).The newly obtained results also demonstrate a shift of the 12 mixing angle towards lower values, increasing the tension with the KamLAND experiment slightly increasing the significance of a nonzero 13 .A combined analysis of neutrino data from multiple sources was performed in an attempt to obtain an enhanced constrain on 13 , with a result of a non-zero 13 with a statistical significance of 3.2 .This work also presents improvements in the optical calibration of the detector in the NCD phase, having reached a precision in the optical parameters comparable to the results of the previous phases, despite the added difficulty with the introduction of the neutral current detector (NCD) into the heavy water (D 2 O) volume.These improvements permitted to reduce the systematic uncertainties in the energy reconstruction and therefore extract the most interesting physics from the full data set of SNO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositório da Universidade de Lisboa (University of Lisbon)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207