Predicting coastal cutthroat trout molt productive capacity from physiographic variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the management of anadromous coastal cutthroat trout, fisheries managers require an understanding of how physiographic variables, at a watershed scale, influence cutthroat smolt productive capacity. The primary purpose was to produce a practical desktop procedure to reliably predict smolt abundance based upon physiographic variables. A total of 653 annual \nestimates of smolt abundance from 50 watersheds in British Columbia and Washington State were assessed in this study. Cutthroat dominated reaches were identified using hydrology and mapping data, then modelled to predict smolt abundance. The model results found primarily that smolt abundance was weakly correlated with permanent stream length of 0-4% channel gradient \nand lake area of 0-5 ha. The results suggest that smolt abundance is limited partially by the availability of physical habitat within a watershed. The model performance could have been influenced by uncertainties related to the species life history diversity, identification, and undocumented barriers to fish movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".