Reflexiones en torno al urbanismo tartésico del valle medio del Guadiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[ES] En este trabajo afrontamos el reto de analizar el concepto de urbanismo aplicado al estudio de la Protohistoria del suroeste peninsular a través de los enclaves que configuran el poblamiento del valle medio del Guadiana durante la I Edad del Hierro. Para ello, realizamos un recorrido a través de los diferentes estudios que hasta la fecha han definido los parámetros que un enclave debe cumplir para determinar la existencia, o no, de urbanismo. Una vez establecidos los criterios, presentamos los tres ejemplos de asentamiento del valle medio del Guadiana que más se aproximan a los prototipos urbanos definidos para territorios vecinos como el valle del Guadalquivir. Los datos arqueológicos analizados nos permiten presentar una lectura preliminar acerca de la presencia de un urbanismo incipiente en el Guadiana Medio entre los siglos VII – IV a.C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".