MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6996089726

Règlement sur les droits d'inscription au Cégep du Vieux Montréal

2016· other· fr· W6996089726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · 2016
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Field (mathematics)Focus (optics)Subject (documents)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12D/43I) Adopté lors de la 245 e assemblée (spéciale) du conseil d'administration le 15 décembre 1993 Modifié lors de la 253 e assemblée (annuelle) du conseil d'administration le 30 novembre 1994 Modifié lors de la 264 e assemblée (régulière) du conseil d'administration le 3 avril 1996 Modifié lors de la 284 e assemblée (annuelle) du conseil d'administration le 25 novembre 1998 Modifié lors de la 285 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 17 février 1999 Modifié lors de la 286 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 28 avril 1999 Modifié lors de la 298 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 6 juin 2001 Modifié lors de la 303 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 5 juin 2002 Modifié lors de la 309 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 4 juin 2003 Modifié lors de la 311 e assemblée (annuelle) du conseil d'administration le 26 novembre 2003 Modifié lors de la 324 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 22 février 2006 Modifié lors de la 341 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 30 avril 2008 Modifié lors de la 382 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 10 juin 2015 Modifié lors de la 386 e assemblée (ordinaire) du conseil d'administration le 27 avril 2016

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government)→French-language works237,207→