Quebec as an example of a mixed jurisdiction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the former president of the Association for Canadian Studies in German-Speaking Countries (GKS) and historian Ursula Lehmkuhl reads Métis resilience against the theories of Bourdieu and Foucault.Her paper touches upon the still prevalent core ethics of British colonial relations with North America's Indigenes, "the Honour of the Crown," as a post-liberal normative political instrument demanding a full recognition of the Métis as an Aboriginal nation whose land-rights and cultural self-determination were guaranteed by the British Crown and must be upheld by the Canadian government today.The historical aspects of Métis resistance that the two essays by Klooss and Lehmkuhl discuss are the subject matter of another, this time literary, piece that we are proud to present here, namely the excerpts from The Seven Oaks Reader (NeWest Press, 2016) written by Myrna Kostash, acclaimed Canadian writer and icon of Canadian creative non-fiction writing.The Seven Oaks Reader includes multiple voices that recall the memory of the Battle of Seven Oaks, which constitutes the historic turning point in the formation of both Métis nation and Canadian nation on the whole.We think thus that there could be no better way of closing this section than by completing it with Kostash's piece that creatively explores this epitome of heroic resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".