MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996156970

Reflective Narrative as Inquiry: Expanding Our Understanding of In-service Teachers’ Experiences with and Needs in Working with English Language Learners

2017· article· en· W6996156970 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGraduate School, University of MarylandCollege of Pharmacy, University of MichiganUniversity of PennsylvaniaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at AustinUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of MissouriCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of MichiganMcGill UniversityUniversity of CalgaryFrances McClelland Institute for Children, Youth, and FamiliesVanderbilt University
KeywordsNarrativeReflection (computer programming)English languageReflective practiceComprehension approachEnglish as a second languageFirst languageQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the 67 th Annual Conference of the Literacy Research Association.For those of you attending the LRA conference for the first time, I encourage you to explore the range of opportunities available this week.I want to draw your attention first to some major events you will not want to miss:• On Wednesday, November 29, at 4:45 p.m., be sure to attend the annual Presidential Address.LRA President Rebecca Rogers will present "Literacy Research, Racial Consciousness, and Equitable Flows of Knowledge," and following her talk, she invites you to join her at the Presidential Reception

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.033
Scholarly communication0.0180.021
Open science0.0040.017
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)Same topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207