MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996163340

The role of beaver dam networks in regulating surface flows

2024· article· en· W6996163340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaverHydrographHydrology (agriculture)Water storageEcosystemSurface waterWetlandDam removalWater level
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beavers are ecosystem engineers that are widely recognized for their ability to modify ecosystem hydrology through dam-building activities. Beaver dams increase surface water storage through the formation of beaver ponds. When full, ponds can spill water to those downstream which has led to dam sequences being described as cascading systems. However, the fill-and-spill concept has yet to be applied to beaver-impacted systems. Additionally, existing studies have focused on the hydrological effects of individual dams or dam sequences, but very little is known about water transmission across the larger dam networks that beaver typically construct. This thesis tests the utility of the fill-and-spill concept to explain surface flow regulation through a network of dams that vary in flow state and are leaky in nature. The hydrological response of a network of 28 dams at Sibbald Fen, a mountain wetland in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, was examined following a 73-year, 37-year, 11-year, and 6-year rainfall event occurring in 2023. Drone surveys were conducted to measure changes in surface water extent and storage for each pond over the study period. Pond and stream hydrographs were used to assess the timing and magnitude of peak flows down the network, and observations of dam flow state were also recorded. Surface water extent and storage expanded during spring freshet and contracted during the summer. Responses in pond storage and dam flow state were also dynamic across the network in response to individual rainfall events. Hydrograph analysis for the four rainfall events indicated that the dam network did not effectively delay or appreciably reduce the magnitude of peak flows. Thus, sequential filling and spilling across the network from the upstream ponds to the downstream ponds was not observed. Instead, ponds expanded in surface area. These findings suggest the potential influence of other hydrological processes on network hydrological functioning, specifically overbank flows and flow through beaver canals, in regulating water transmission across the network. This type of flow regulation is better aligned with the variable source area concept than the fill-and-spill concept. The significant contributions of this research will scale to the cumulative impact of beaver dam networks on flow routing and their potential role as a natural flood management strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207