MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996208082

Safety measures at rural stop controlled intersection in UMP Gambang

2017· other· en· W6996208082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUMP Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Pahang) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)LimitingWork (physics)Noise (video)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project is a research about safety measures at rural stop controlled intersection in UMP Gambang. The case study was conducted at the main road that are located heading to Kolej Kediaman 2 and Kolej Kediaman 4 from the entrance road of UMP or from highway. The traffic sign and marking data was collected from observation while geometric design data was collected from observation. The information about accident data was collected from Bahagian Keselamatan UMP and the data of traffic volume was gathered from survey. The survey of traffic volume was conducted for 1 day during peak hour which is in morning and evening for 1 hours. The survey includes various mode of transport such as cars, motorbike, buses and others that passing the road according to their classes during summer. Safety level will be assessed according to the warrants. From the research that had been done, the number of accident increases because volume of transportation increases. Most of UMP students have cars and motorcycles the factor that contribute to this phenomena are traffic marking faded, and human behaviour. This is because the road provide confusion as the junction looks straight at every each of the way. Some of the road user does not know which way is the priority while the others just do not follow the rules. Besides that, some of the traffic sign is not follow the standard. This may lead the road user ignore the sign and rules. They are not following the rules and based on my observation, they speed more than proposed speed and U-turn at place that U-turn is not allowed. The condition of the traffic marking is also not good because the marking is already faded. This provide confusion to the road user as the road is design to give way but the road user does not aware of the faded road marking. As there are many accident happened there, the barricades is used to overcome this problems, however, there are still accident happened because road user do not comply with the laws of the road. Based on the geometric data, Summary of Specific Factors and Form of Intersection Control Choice. (Sources: Safety and Operational Assessments conducted by Alberta Transportation) are referred to determine suitable level of intersection for this intersection. From the results, roundabout is the most suitable for this intersection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it