MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996247151

A review of South Carolina school districts utilization of financial flexibility provisions

2012· article· en· W6996247151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe South Carolina State Library Digital Collections (South Carolina State Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSchool Choice and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)South carolinaQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)Fiscal year
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Giving financial flexibility to school districts within specific parameters has been a priority of the South Carolina General Assembly. Furthermore, promoting dramatic innovation in schools and school districts will likely require changes in the allocation of resources. Are school districts in the state using the existing flexibility provisions? If so, how are districts utilizing the existing flexibility provisions? The following brief documents the utilization of these financial flexibility provisions by school districts in Fiscal Year 2010-11 and in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2011-12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe South Carolina State Library Digital Collections (South Carolina State Library)Same topicSchool Choice and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207