MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996264895

Report of the NAFO Joint Commission-Scientific Council Working Group on Risk-Based Management Strategies (WG-RBMS) Meeting

2021· report· en· W6996264895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2021
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Group (periodic table)Work (physics)Working groupLegislationDirective
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The meeting was opened by the co-Chairs Fernando González-Costas (European Union) and Ray Walsh (Canada) at 08:30 hours (Atlantic Daylight Time in Halifax, Nova Scotia) on Tuesday, 24 August 2021.
\nThe co-Chairs welcomed the representatives from Canada, European Union, Japan, Norway, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and the United States of America. The Scientific Council (SC) Chair, SC Precautionary Approach Working Group (PA-WG) co-Chairs were also welcomed (Annex 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.140
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.167
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1400.167
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.381
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.005 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))French-language works237,207