Responding to AUD in Sudbury, Ontario through the senses of architectural intervention: a metamorphosis of body, mind, and soul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Life is a story of recovery. Some people that undergo a traumatic experience try to cope in an unhealthy way. “When humans face a challenge or threat, they have a partly physical response. The body activates resources that help people either stay and confront the challenge or get to safety as fast as possible.” 1 After these traumatic experiences, often adults turn to alcohol and substances to numb their feelings and, as a result, this behaviour can lead to addictions. Major health issues can arise from substance abuse and in worse case scenarios, death. An article from Health Essentials explains that “patients who show up with liver problems have been long time drinkers but have also experienced something in their life that’s caused an uptick in their recent alcohol use.” 2 In the year 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world. This pandemic has caused people to remain in their home for extended periods of time. Due to increased stress levels from this experience, there has been an increase in alcohol consumption. As an article in Addition Rehab Toronto stated, “with increased feelings of anxiety and stress resulting from COVID-19, alcohol intake has increased in Canada. According to new data, alcohol sales have increased considerably compared to last year’s number.” Architecture plays a significant role in our daily lives and these spaces are specific to our experiences which influence our choices. Bars have been designed for the consumption of alcohol, drinking culture is heavily embedded into human societies. Some of the oldest bars first established in Canada date back to 1789. 4 The concept of Rehab centres is relatively new in our global culture. “Small rehab facilities have been operating since 1840.” 5 Rehab centres are designed to support patients with addictions through the rehabilitation process. How can architectural design foster the recovery of people recovering from addiction? The city of Greater Sudbury, Ontario, is in need of a new type of Health facility. One which enhances the assets of the addiction rehabilitation task force composed of organizations such as Ontario Addiction Treatment Centres, Monarch Recovery Services, Health Science North, Northwood Recovery Clinic, CAMH and AA. This thesis will explore the connection between our built environments, the senses and how these spaces can contribute to the recovery process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".