RISCO DE FRAGILIDADE E TEMPO DE INSTITUCIONALIZAÇÃO EM IDOSOS INDEPENDENTES DE UMA INSTITUIÇÃO DE LONGA PERMANÊNCIA PARA IDOSOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduo: A Instituio de Longa Permanncia para Idosos (ILPI) constitui uma importante modalidade de ateno ao idoso no Brasil, pois apesar de ser baixo o nmero de instituies e de idosos nelas residentes (menos de 1% dos idosos brasileiros), recebe pessoas consideradas frgeis ou em situao de fragilidade.Muitos idosos procuram as instituies asilares pela certeza de estarem em um local onde sero cuidados por profissionais capacitados, garantindo sua segurana e sade.Objetivos: Verificar a relao entre o tempo de institucionalizao e o risco de fragilidade em idosos institucionalizados.Metodologia: Pacientes de uma ILPI's da cidade de Porto Alegre -RS foram avaliados quanto ao risco de fragilidade e desempenho cognitivo.Foram includos na pesquisa idosos semi-independentes e independentes de acordo com a classificao da instituio e sem diagnstico de demncia contido no pronturio.Para avaliao do risco de fragilidade foi utilizado o protocolo de Escala de Fragilidade de Edmonton (EFS), ele avalia nove domnios:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".