MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996356547

Seniors in the City Centres - Community Gardens in Metropolitan City Centres

2012· article· cs· W6996356547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaQuarter (Canadian coin)Urban environmentUrban planningUrban area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seniors are placed in homes for the elderly, often l ocated outside the city center, without any relationship to the social life in the city. The new home should offer to a residents mainly possibility to create a community conected with a area and "normal" life around. Present time is hectic and people in cities are working under pressure.They are looking for opportunities for relaxation and active recreation. For this reason, community gardens began to form. It is a place in the urban greenery and abandoned or unused parts of a city centres, which manage group of people in the neighborhood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207