A semblant que hom pinta sent Christòfol: bautismos y milagros en valencia (1391)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout the summer of 1391, the Jewish quarters of Iberia were \nassaulted. The night of July 9 was the turn for the aljama of Valencia, the first \nand most aggressive of the pogroms of the Crown of Aragon. As a result, the \nvast majority of Jews were forced to convert or die. According to the version \nof the city, the conversion of the Jews was validated by the divine will, since \na series of miracles took place such as the increase in chrism in the parishes \nor the appearance of Saint Christopher with the baby Jesus on the main synagogue. \nThus, the pogrom was authorized, since God himself had orchestrated \nthe events and the crown could do little to recriminate what had been a divine \ndesign. Among the wonders that happened, the one by Saint Christopher stands \nout, since the story of the apparition gave rise to a set of legends in which that \nmanifestation of the saint became a physical image, one that interacted with \nJews. Therefore, it can be extracted from these readings the importance given \nto images, channels of communication between the divinity and the faithful. \nHowever, what is interesting is no longer the subsequent reconception of the \nhistory of its appearance, but the way in which it becomes a physical object, \ngiving it materiality. Furthermore, the choice of this saint as one of the protagonists \non the night of the pogrom has much to do with his legend, one in which \nthe virtue of conversion stands out. This would explain the choice of him as \npatron of the re-founded synagogue in a church under his dedication and where \nthe convert community took shelter, a topic that will be analyzed in this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".