MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6996575647

Sherman Zavitz fonds, 1991-2021, n.d.

2023· other· en· W6996575647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Feature (linguistics)Local historyGeorge (robot)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sherman Zavitz was originally from Welland but moved to Niagara Falls in 1960. He was a teacher for 35 years and taught at several elementary schools in the city during his career. After moving to Niagara Falls he became interested in the City’s history and learned about it by reading, talking to others, and exploring the city. In 1994 the Lundy’s Lane Historical Society nominated Zavitz for the position of Official Historian for the City of Niagara Falls, which was approved by city council. He remained in this role until he retired in 2019. He was also Official Historian of the Niagara Parks Commission. Zavitz wrote many columns for the Niagara Falls Review on the history of Niagara Falls, including two regular series, “A Niagara Note” and a photo feature known as “Niagara Then and Now”. In addition to these articles, Zavitz wrote several books on Niagara’s history including Niagara Falls: Historical Notes, Then and Now: Niagara Falls, Ontario, and It Happened at Niagara. Some of his other activities included hosting local walking tours, appearances on local TV and radio, past president of the Lundy’s Lane Historical Society, and serving on the Board of Directors for the Canadian Canal Society, the Friends of Fort George, and Niagara Falls Museums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2240.082

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→French-language works237,207→