The significance of components of centralised labour quarter (CLQ) standard for workers’ housing and amenities / Muhamad Afiq bin Zully Romzi and Asmalia Che Ahmad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The introduction of the Centralised Labour Quarters (CLQ) through the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) project is still new in the construction industry, therefore there are targets to be implemented in the long run. Unfortunately, due to the high standards given by the first MRT project, this is a burden for other construction sites to apply for in its construction area. The aim of this research is to investigate the basic needs component of CLQ standard to implement for worker housing and amenities. A questionnaire survey was conducted to seek for the significant of the component from 10 Worker Packaging Contractor (WPC). This data collection was analysed by using SPSS version 25. The result indicates that 5 out of 10 components is necessary to recommend for other construction site which are electricity, first aid and medical facilities, water, drainage, and water disposal. Majority of these findings are fit to function and comply to the Malaysian Standard (MS). However, there are several improvements proposed to further promote and develop a sustainability environment of the working housing and amenities for other CLQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".