MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996604740

Stability assessment of aging water-retaining earth fill dams

2020· dissertation· en· W6996604740 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDe La Salle University
KeywordsCreepResidual strengthResidualShear (geology)Deformation (meteorology)InstabilityShear strength (soil)Safety factor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous earth fill water-retaining dams in power generating stations that were constructed in the 1950’s are still in active service today. Despite satisfactory performance for over fifty years, an aging earth dam (CBBD2) began to show signs of instability by exhibiting sudden movement in its upstream side. Although remedial measures to increase stability has been put into place, it was imperative to understand what caused the sudden movement. There was a need to develop and calibrate a numerical model based on the observed conditions in CBBD2 using parameters determined from extensive laboratory tests conducted on collected soil samples. The calibrated model was used to evaluate the long-term perform performance of other aging earth fill dams to assess if they still meet current dam safety standards. The calibrated model that represented the expected deformation and stability conditions of CBBD2 included creep deformation analyses using clay strength values between the post peak and residual shear strengths. Results indicated that the reduction of shear strength in fissured overconsolidated clays from a post peak value to the average between post peak and residual shear strengths with creep movement, predominantly occurring at the upstream slope, led to the delayed instability in CBBD2. Stability assessment of the remaining earth dams, considering time-dependent creep deformation and using clay strength values between the post peak and residual shear strengths, indicated that these dams were still stable with factors of safety greater than unity. Particular attention must be given to CBBD4 as the factor of safety was at unity which could be an indication of impending failure. Based on the shear creep test results, a factor of safety higher than 1.3 would be needed to avoid long-term failure due to creep. Only two of the remaining seven earth fill dams passed this criteria, implying that there is a need to closely monitor the other dams with regards to creep deformation to avoid creep rupture in the future. In addition, none of the dams had safety factors greater than 1.5 which meant that these dams are still subject to remedial measures to meet this safety requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207