Social animations as a technology of integration of youth with disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A brief analysis of different approaches to the definition of «animation», in particular in terms of economics, psychology, pedagogy and social work. The role and place of social animation in creating an environment in which each individual will be able to successfully develop and self-realize for the benefit of society. A comparison of approaches to the use of social animation in foreign countries. In particular, the experience of the USA, Canada, France and Finland is analyzed. The latest researches and publications on the problem of social animation of youth in Ukraine are analyzed. It was found that the main directions of social animation work are overcoming personal tendencies to social disintegration (prevention of socio-psychological disorders, such as deviant behavior of adolescents, drug addiction, alcoholism, suicide, etc.); rehabilitation of critical states of personality; assistance in creative self-realization of the individual. The scope of professional activity of a social worker in the field of social animation is defined. The peculiarities of social animation with young people with disabilities are considered, and it is found that social animation with young people with disabilities overcoming socio-psychological isolation. Social animation allows to create conditions for personal growth and productive interpersonal communication in the process of leisure, directs to socially significant activities. The positive consequences of the organization of social animation with young people with disabilities are highlighted. Social animation allows to create conditions for personal growth and productive interpersonal communication in the process of leisure, directs to socially significant activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".