MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996707058

THE SULEYMANIYE MOSQUE AND ITS OFFICIALS ACCORDING TO KANUNI'S FOUNDATION CERTIFICATE

2022· article· tr· W6996707058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)CertificateQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camiler, İslâm medeniyetinin en önemli kurumların-- dan biridir. Başlangıçtan günümüze kadar ibadethâne olmalarının yanında eğitim, barınma, ordu karargâhı, adliye, yardımlaşma ve dayanışma gibi pek çok ihtiyacın karşılandığı mekânlar olmuşlardır. AHMET Koç PROF. DR. MARMARA U. iLAHiYAT FAKÜLTESİ öMER ÖZDEMİR AR.GÖR. MARMARA U. SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ İslâm tarihi boyunca şehir planlarının merkezinde yer alan camiler, zaman içerisinde gelişmiş külliye yapı-- ların da ana unsuru olmuşlardır. Bu külliyelerde cami, medrese, mektep, kütüphane, muvakkithâne, hazîre, dârüşşifâ, imâret, tabhâne, çarşı, han, hamam, çeşme gibi çok işlevsel yapılar yer almıştır. Bu külliyelerin en güzel örneklerini Osmanlı'da görmek mümkündür. Bu örnekler içerisinde Süleymaniye Külliyesi'nin ayrı bir yeri vardır. Bu külliye Osmanlı Devleti'nin en güçlü padişahlarından biri olan Kanünî döneminde ve en büyük mimarlarından Sinan tarafından yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, Süleymaniye Külliyesi hakkında genel bilgiler verildikten sonra Külliyenin ana yapısı olan Süleymaniye Camii'nde yürütülen hizmetler ve bunları yerine getiren personelin nitelikleri ile bunların görevleri ve aldıkları ücretler üzerinde durulacaktır.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi)Same topicHistory and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207