MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996741527

Standing Ring Blowup Solutions for the Cubic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation

2012· dissertation· en· W6996741527 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsNonlinear Schrödinger equationBounded functionSchrödinger equationNonlinear systemSplit-step methodPartial differential equation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cubic focusing nonlinear Schrodinger equation is a canonical model equation that arises in physics and engineering, particularly in nonlinear optics and plasma physics. Cubic NLS is an accessible venue to refine techniques for more general nonlinear partial differential equations. In this thesis, it is shown there exist solutions to the focusing cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation in three dimensions that blowup on a circle, in the sense of L2-norm concentration on a ring, bounded H1-norm outside any surrounding toroid, and growth of the global H1-norm with the log-log rate. Analogous behaviour occurs in higher dimensions. That is, there exists data for which the corresponding evolution by the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation explodes on a set of co-dimension two. To simplify the exposition, the proof is presented in dimension three, with remarks to indicate the adaptations in higher dimension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it