MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996774577

TC Space Data Link Protocol . Blue Book. Issue 2. September 2010 - CCSDS 232.0-B-2

2010· article· en· W6996774577 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyCenter for Long-Term Cybersecurity, University of California BerkeleyGeo-Informatics and Space Technology Development AgencyIran Telecommunication Research CenterEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesKorea Aerospace Research InstituteNational Commission for Science and TechnologyTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Space OrganizationChina National Space AdministrationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeChinese Academy of SciencesU.S. Geological SurveyIndian Space Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsRetransmissionProtocol (science)Data linkData systemData transmissionAsynchronous communicationSpace (punctuation)Transfer (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Recommended Standard for TC Space Data Link Protocol specifies the protocol, services, and procedures pertaining to the CCSDS Version-1 Asynchronous Transfer Frame. The current issue adds specifications and parameters to support a systematic retransmission option..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207