MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996775460

Synthesis of carbon nanotubes supported iron catalysts for light olefins via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

2023· dissertation· en· W6996775460 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsCatalysisSyngasSelectivityCarbon nanotubeHydrocarbonAcetyleneYield (engineering)Olefin fiber
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light olefins including ethylene, propylene and butylene are the basics of many chemical products. As the demand for light olefins is dramatically increased and oil resources are limited, it becomes desirable to produce light olefins from other resources such as syngas. Syngas could be obtained from alternative feedstocks such as methane, coal, biomass, and plastic wastes. Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis involves conversion of syngas to hydrocarbons. FT products at high temperatures are mainly gasoline and light olefins. In FT catalytic reaction, iron is preferred due to its low cost, high selectivity towards olefins and flexibility in terms of use for different ratio of H2 to CO in syngas feed. In this study, catalytic performance of iron catalyst was evaluated using molybdenum and potassium as promoters and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as support. The study plan for this research was divided into four sub-objectives or phases.
\nIn the first phase, catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) method was applied to synthesize CNTs using Fe/CaCO3 and acetylene as catalyst and hydrocarbon source, respectively. Applying response surface methodology, the optimum operating conditions were determined in CVD reactor for maximal yield and purity of CNTs. The effects of reaction time (30–60 min), reaction temperature (700–800 °C), and loading of the catalyst (10–30 wt% Fe) were investigated. 20Fe/CNTs-synthesized, 20Fe/CNTs-commercial, and 20Fe/Al2O3 were analyzed in terms of physio-chemical properties and FTS catalytic performance. The catalytic performance of Fe-based catalysts was investigated using a fixed-bed reactor at 280 °C under 2.0 MPa. 20Fe/CNTs-synthesized exhibited a lower rate of water-gas-shift (WGS) reaction compared with 20Fe/CNTs-commercial, with C2-C4 selectivity of 23.6% which is slightly less than that of its commercial counterpart. After 120 h time-on-stream under steady state condition, the higher activity was maintained by the 20Fe/CNTs-synthesized catalyst compared to the 20Fe/CNTs-Commercial and 20Fe/Al2O3 catalysts.
\nElectronic structural promoters such as K and Mo improve olefins’ selectivity and catalytic activity. Hence, in the second phase, CNTs synthesized by CCVD were used as support to obtain K- and/or Mo-promoted Fe/CNTs catalysts for light olefins’ production in FTS. A two-level full factorial design was applied for K- and/or Mo-promoted Fe/CNTs catalyst to investigate the effects of synthesis conditions including Mo/K mass ratio, ultrasonic time, and iron loading on light olefins’ yield. CO chemisorption and TEM revealed that molybdenum plays a significant role in metal dispersion, leaving structural defects on CNTs support.
\niii
\nAdditionally, H2-TPR confirmed that K as promoter facilitates reducibility of Fe/CNTs catalysts, which promoted CO conversion in FTS. Compared with the un-promoted Fe/CNTs catalysts, addition of molybdenum as a promoter increased light olefins' selectivity by 33.4%, while potassium led to an increase in CO conversion by 96.3%. The optimum formulation (0.5K5Mo10Fe/CNTs) obtained the olefins’ yield of 35.5%.
\nIn the third phase the kinetic study of FTS was performed over the optimum bimetallic promoted catalyst (0.5K5Mo10Fe/CNTs) in a fixed-bed reactor by collecting experimental data over a wide range of industrially relevant reaction conditions (P = 0.68–4.13 MPa, T = 270-290 °C, H2/CO = 1, GHSV = 2000 h-1). Based on the adsorption of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, twenty-two possible mechanisms for monomer formation during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis were proposed in accordance with the Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW) and Eley-Rideal (ER) adsorption theories. Kinetic parameters such as activation energy, adsorption enthalpies of H2 and CO were estimated to be 65.0, -13.0, and -54.0 kJ/mol, respectively. Based on the developed kinetic model, the effects of reaction temperature and pressure were assessed on FTS product distribution. In addition, the Anderson-Schulz-Flory model was applied to further assess the reliability of the best fit mechanistic model for a wide range of hydrocarbon products.
\nIn the fourth phase, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of light olefin production in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reaction were investigated via different scenarios. Data from a lab-scale experiment using the optimum bimetallic promoted catalyst (0.5K5Mo10Fe/CNTs) were used to simulate a plant to produce 1 kg of ethylene/h. The economic feasibility of light olefins production was estimated based on a comprehensive cash flow analysis. The net rate of return (NRR) was calculated to 5.6%, 7.4%, and 18.2% for the base scenario (scenario 1), scenario 2 with wastewater treatment, and scenario 3 with wastewater treatment-separation unit, respectively, which means the project is profitable from an economic perspective. The GHG emissions performance was measured as 77.5 g CO2-eq per MJ ethylene confirming the significant GHG emissions decrease compared to petroleum-based fuels production (3686 g CO2-eq per MJ ethylene).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207