The SW quarter of Carthage and its main monument: new results on the topographical context, construction and develeopment of the circus, based on fieldwork in 2015-2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En esta obra colectiva se presentan los resultados del proyecto de excavación arqueológica en el área del circo romano de Cartago (Túnez), ejecutadas entre 2015 y 2017. Se hace un resumen del surgimiento de proyecto, del estado de la cuestión previo al inicio de las excavaciones, caracterizado por una larga historia de excavaciones antiguas en los alrededores del yacimiento, pero casi ninguna publicación de sondeos estratigráficos en el interior del mayor de los edificios de la Cartago romana, el segundo circo romano más grande del Imperio tras el circo máximo en Roma. Los sondeos A, B y C han hallado restos de época púnica, del Alto y Bajo Imperio romano, y reutilizaciones y expolios de época tardoantigua y medieval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".