MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996805299

Summary analysis of homelessness quarterly financial and performance reports - quarter 3 2019

2019· report· en· W6996805299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) · 2019
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)AccommodationFinancial servicesFinancial analysisRelation (database)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the delegated funding arrangements in place between the Department and the housing authorities, housing authorities prepare and submit financial and performance reports in relation to homeless accommodation and related services to the Department on a quarterly basis. It is the responsibility of the lead authority for each region to submit the financial and performance reports to the Department.
\nFollowing submission of the Quarter 3 financial and performance reports the Department has conducted an analysis of the data received.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.002
Bibliometrics0.0280.032
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin)French-language works237,207