MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996833778

TerminoWeb: A Software Environment for Term Study in Rich Contexts

2006· article· en· W6996833778 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Set (abstract data type)Task (project management)Term (time)SoftwareWork (physics)Thematic map
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TerminoWeb is designed to provide a work environment for terminologists to help them in one of their multiple tasks, that of doing a thematic search toward the understanding and the definition of a set of terms for a new domain (theme). It is a time consuming task for the terminologist to read through several documents to get an understanding of a domain and apprehend its main concepts and their interrelations. The purpose of TerminoWeb is to provide functionalities for collecting knowledge-rich documents into a corpus, for discovering important terms, and for exploring knowledge-rich contexts around these terms in the corpus. Such work environment would allow terminologists to focus their attention more quickly on the important material to read.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207