MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996836460

Stay Out For Three Years After High School Or Play In Canada - And For Good Reason: An Antitrust Look at <i>Clarett v. National Football League</i>

2005· article· en· W6996836460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrooklyn law review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Law and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionFootballConjunction (astronomy)LeagueCommerce Clause
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In conjunction with its stated eligibility rules, found in the league's Constitution & Bylaws, the NFL has an application for players who have not completed their college eligibility and are seeking "special eligibility" for the NFL Draft.The petition for .specialeligibility" states: "Applications [for special eligibility] will be accepted only for college players for whom at least three full college seasons have elapsed since their high school graduation."(hereinafter "three-year rule").NFL Eligibility Rules and Petition for Special Eligibility and Renunciation of College Eligibility (1991), reprinted in Leigh Steinberg, Representing the Professional Football Player, in 1 LAW OF PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR SPORTS 6-1, app.6D (Gary A. Uberstine ed., 2002).It is the three-year rule that is the subject of this Note.The official rule of the NFL's Constitution & Bylaws states: No person shall be eligible to play or be selected as a player unless (1) all college football eligibility of such player has expired; or (2) at least five (5) years shall have elapsed since the player first entered or attended a recognized junior college, college, or university; or (3) such player receives a diploma from a recognized college or university prior to September 1st of the next football season of the League.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrooklyn law reviewSame topicBusiness Law and EthicsFrench-language works237,207