Technologie fortifikovaných vín vyráběných mimo Evropu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is focused on the technology of fortified wines outside Europe. The production of this specific type of wine is described for each of engaged continent and country. The first chapter describes this wines generally, what is the difference in technology compared to still wines, how they are divided, etc. The American continent, whether the north or the southern part, is described in the second chapter. Attention is paid to California, Canada and Argentina in particular. The third chapter is focused on the southern part of Africa. The technology of the production of port wine, sherry and brandy is described here. The fourth chapter focuses on the Asian continent. They are countries such as Russia, India or China listed. China is known for its fortified rice wines. The last chapter is focused on Australia. Among other things, there is a famous Rutherglen Muscat or Tokay (Topaque). In the annex, there are described three basic technologies of European styles of fortified wines - Port, Sherry and Madeira, for comparison.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".