MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996877171

Studies of selective chemical catalysis by hydrolases

2002· dissertation· en· W6996877171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisChemical synthesisGovernment (linguistics)Hydrolysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrolase catalyzed reactions are used for selective chemical catalysis. With directed evolution, rational mutations and molecular modeling the selectivity of these hydrolases can be increased and the origin of selectivity determined. This study investigates four selective hydrolase catalyzed reactions. Using molecular modeling the unusual regioselectivity of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase (PCL) and the selectivity of Candida antarctica B lipase (CAL-B) in nucleoside acylation reactions has been attributed to the binding of the nucleoside base within the active site. The enantio-selectivity of Pseudomonas fluorescens esterase (PFE) has been improved using a rational approach to directed evolution and models to explain the origin of improved mutants has been produced. The enantioselectivity of the beta-lactam ring opening reaction by CAL-B has been attributed to unfavorable steric interaction of the substrate with Ile189 and a model has been proposed for an alcohol bridge between the catalytic histidine (His224) and the lactam amine. Finally, high acetyl selectivity of ThermoGen esterase E018b has been demonstrated and reaction conditions optimized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207