MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996950427

Sviluppo di materiale composito Graphene/poliestere dissipativo di cariche elettrostatiche per applicazioni in ambienti corrosivi.

2019· article· en· W6996950427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAMS Degree Thesis (University of Bologna) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermosetting polymerGlass fiberCompression moldingFlexural strengthAbsorption of waterFiberComposite numberEpoxyCompression (physics)Molding (decorative)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project has led to the development of a new industrial-aimed thermosetting nanocomposite, capable of electrostatic dissipation while guaranteeing the mechanical properties distinguishing of a glass fiber reinforced composite. \nThe matrix consists in a polyester resin, industrially formulated for glass fiber reinforced composites; commercially available graphene nanoplatelets are being used as the fillers, provided by NanoXplore, Canada; both unreinforced and \nglass fiber reinforced configurations of the composite has been made. \nThe production process has been chosen accordingly to the scalability need. Filler dispersion has been obtained through high shear mixing and 6 weight concentration were used, namely 0%, 1%, 3%, 5% ,7% and 10%. Samples have been produced by compression molding with previous manual lay-up preparation of the sample; specimens for the tests were cut directly from the plate sample with the help of a table saw and subsequent sandpaper refining. Electrical characterization has identified a percolation threshold in the range 3÷5 wt%, showing an increase in conductivity of over 7 orders of magnitude; cross plane conductivity is as high as 10-4 [S/cm] for the most conductive sample, with in-plane and cross-section conductivities consistently lower by an order of magnitude. The significant increase of permittivity values in the percolated samples suggests a possible suitability for EMI shielding due to absorption mechanism. Tests on mechanical behavior didn't show any clear trend in relation to fillers content, with variations between the samples shown through all the concentration range; overall, the presence of nanofillers don’t seem to significantly affect flexural and strength properties. Finally, the developed nanocomposite met the objective regarding surface and volume conductivity for electrostatic dissipation while maintaining the mechanical properties of the neat reinforced composite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAMS Degree Thesis (University of Bologna)Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207