MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996967674

Tenant satisfaction and its evaluation

2014· other· en· W6996967674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuezvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaseQuality (philosophy)Service qualityControl (management)Customer satisfactionService (business)Consumer satisfactionGoods and services
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

© Canadian Center of Science and Education. The competitiveness of any enterprise depends on the consumer satisfaction by goods and services produced. Tenant satisfaction with regard to the rented space is a general assessment, which consists of the quality assessment of real estate, service (interaction) quality and quality of service offerings. The article presents the lease options, which are advisable to use when assessing the tenant satisfaction and necessary improvements. The assessment of consumer satisfaction allows one to control the quality management system effectiveness and to identify the areas, in which it is necessary to make improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuezvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus)French-language works237,207