MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6996997615

Tourisme, environnement, société et développement durable Tourism, environment, society and sustainable development

2020· other· fr· W6996997615 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité du Littoral Côte d'OpaleUniversité de NamurUniversité du MaineUniversità degli studi di BergamoUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Lorraine
KeywordsSustainable developmentSustainabilityGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis le processus de démocratisation du régime, le Bénin mise sur le tourisme pour participer au développement du pays. Le récent plan stratégique de développement touristique (2017-2027), la création de formations de niveau supérieur dans les domaines du tourisme et de l’hôtellerie ainsi que les nouvelles options retenues par le gouvernement en matière de durabilité laissent entrevoir le développement d’un tourisme de meilleure qualité reposant sur la valorisation des atouts indéniables du territoire et une bien meilleure maîtrise de ce secteur d’activité par les autochtones. C’est dans ce contexte qu’est née l’idée d’une organisation conjointe d’un colloque international pluridisciplinaire. Ainsi, à partir de la thématique transversale du tourisme, le colloque explore des disciplines variées telles que l’agronomie, les sciences sociales et économiques, la géographie humaine et physique, les potentialités de l’environnement et les dialogues Nord-Sud et Sud-Nord, l’usage des technologies numériques et des formations en matière de développement durable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1720.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)→Same topicFrench Urban and Social Studies→French-language works237,207→