MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997151675

Treaty with the Cherokee Nation. Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Interior, relative to the sixteenth article of the treaty of 19th July, 1866, with the Cherokee Nation of Indians

2016· other· en· W6997151675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCherokeeTreatyState (computer science)HonorQuarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)Section (typography)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIR: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication of the 20th ultimo~ transmitting the report and accompanying papers presented to the Department by Thomas Wistar and George-Howland, jr., who were appointed commiss;oners to arrange certain difficulties between the Cherokee and Osage Indians, growing out of the change of the line of the 96th meridian.In compliance with your instructions to state my views and suggestions thereon, I respectfully report as follows, viz:It l>eing the policy of the Go,ernment to remove from the State of Kansas, so far as possible, Indian tribes residing therein, the Great and Little Osages were, in accordance with section 12 of the Indian appropriation act, approved July 15, 1870, (Stat.at IJarge, vol.16, p. 362,) induced to dispose of their lands in that State and remove to the Indian Territory, where a suitable reservation in compact form, equal to 160 acres for each member of the tribe, was to be provided for them west of the 96th meridian, the United States hm-ing the right to settle friendly Indians thereon, as provided in the Cherokee treaty of July 19, 1866.(Stat.at Large, vol.14, p. 799.)A preliminary survey was made in order to determine, as nearly as was at that time practicable, the line of the 96th meridian, and the Osages thereupon selected and removed to a tract adjoining and immediately west of the supposed line, believed to be 60 miles in length from north to south, and 14.58! miles from east to west, and to contain 560,000 acres.Recently the official survey of the line of the 9Gth meridian has been made, and is shown to be about 3~ miles to the west, and the length of the tract assigned to the Osages to be but 59 miles 68.53 chains.thereby throwing a part of the Osage lands, with most of their valuable improvements, east of the 9Gth meridian, and reducing the quantity of land embraced in said tract to 506,934 acres.To remedy the embarrassment caused by this discovery, :Messrs.Wistar and Howland were designated by the Department as commissioners to arrange with the Cherokee authorities for the purpose of securing, if practicable, their assent to the Osages remaining on that portion of their lands thrown east of the 96th meridian by the survey; otherwise to select a. new reservation for them, and full instructions were given said commissioners to that end by this office, under date of November 4, 1871.From the report of said commissioners now submitted, it appears that, the Osages have agreed to take, in lieu of the lands first assigneu them in the Cherokee country, the whole of the tract lying between the 96th meridian "and the main channel of the .Arkansas River, with the south line of the State of Kansas for a northern l>oundary, and the North Creek line and the main channel of the Arkansas River for a southern and western boundars," the price to be fixed by the President.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)French-language works237,207