MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997315461

Wing, Kenneth (audio interview #1 of 2)

2020· other· en· W6997315461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionSubject (documents)ArchitectureGold coastMillerQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUBJECT BIO - Kenneth Wing was an architect who designed public buildings such the Long Beach City Hall and Arena as well as many private homes and other buildings. He was the first architect in Long Beach to become a fellow of the American Institute of Architects and the first graduate of the USC school of architecture to be so honored. Wing's family moved from Colorado to Long Beach in 1917 and he finished high school here while working as an "office boy" for local architect Horace Austin. After graduating from USC, he began a private practice in Long Beach, primarily designing private homes. Soon, however, he was also designing schools, churches and other public buildings. In these 2 interviews, Wing talks about designing buildings as well as serving on the Long Beach Planning Commission and the Board of Examiners and Appeals. \n \nTOPICS - Topics on this side of tape include: family background; education; architecture; Horace Austin; Mayer and Holler and Long Beach AirportTopics on this side of tape include: subsidence; Carmelitos Housing Project; Hancock Oil Company offices; Rancho Los Cerritos and Country Club DriveTopics on this side of tape include: CSULB building; UC Irvine building; Pacific Coast Club; Ocean Center building and Security Bank building

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge)Same topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207