MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6997447959

Zones de turbulences. La danse de mort, de August Strindberg, Traduit du suédois par Michel Vittoz, mise en scène de Gregory Hlady, production du Groupe de la Veillée, Théâtre Prospero, du 20 novembre au 15 décembre 2012 La robe blanche, Texte, mise en scène et jeu de Pol Pelletier, production autogérée à l’église Sainte-Brigide-de-Kildare (Montréal), du 21 au 30 novembre 2012 Pour un oui ou pour un non, de Nathalie Sarraute, production du Théâtre Galiléo, Théâtre Prospero, du 15 janvier au 9 février 2013

2013· article· fr· W6997447959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)White (mutation)Power (physics)Object (grammar)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zones de turbulences / La danse de mort, de August Strindberg, Traduit du suédois par Michel Vittoz, mise en scène de Gregory Hlady, production du Groupe de la Veillée, Théâtre Prospero, du 20 novembre au 15 décembre 2012 / La robe blanche, Texte, mise en scène et jeu de Pol Pelletier, production autogérée à l’église Sainte-Brigide-de-Kildare (Montréal), du 21 au 30 novembre 2012 / Pour un oui ou pour un non, de Nathalie Sarraute, production du Théâtre Galiléo, Théâtre Prospero, du 15 janvier au 9 février 2013. An article from journal Spirale (Le savoir capital), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)→Same topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→