Компаративіське дослідження визнання недійсності трудового договору та його умов у В’єтнамі та Канаді
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author has found that employment agreements and their terms in Vietnam and Canada can be declared invalid both in whole and in part. Thus, an employment agreement is completely invalid in one of the following cases: (1) the entire content of the employment agreement violates the law, i.e. all provisions of the employment agreement do not comply with the legislation; (2) the person concluding the employment agreement is incompetent or violates the principles of concluding an employment agreement; (3) the work specified in the employment agreement is work prohibited by law; (4) the terms of the employment agreement concluded after the fact significantly change the main terms of the employment offer letter (for example, changes the offer from an indefinite-term agreement to a fixed-term contract, changes the previously offered notice of termination to the statutory minimum, or adds restrictive terms (for example, non-compete); (5) the employee entered into an indefinite-term agreement and then entered into a fixed-term contract; (6) there is ambiguity in the content of the agreement; (6) the content of the agreement does not meet minimum labor standards; (7) the employer will change the existing employment agreement in such a way as to cancel/restrict an existing contractual or general right of the employee (such as benefits, vacation time, or notice of termination). The employment agreement is partially invalid in the part whose content violates the law but does not affect the rest of the contract. The author has discovered that only a court has the right to declare an employment agreement invalid in Vietnam and Canada. If an employment agreement is partially invalid, the employer and the employee are obliged to make amendments and additions to the part of the invalid employment agreement. If an employment agreement is fully invalid due to incompetence or violation of the principles of concluding an employment agreement by the person signing it, the employer and the employee are obliged to re-conclude the employment contract in accordance with the law. If an employment agreement is fully invalid due to the fact that the entire content of the employment agreement contradicts the law or the work provided for by the employment agreement is the work prohibited by law, the employer and the employee must conclude a new employment agreement in accordance with the law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".