MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997625538

Компаративіське дослідження визнання недійсності трудового договору та його умов у В’єтнамі та Канаді

2025· article· en· W6997625538 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific periodicals of Ukraine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)DemotionLimitingNoticeContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author has found that employment agreements and their terms in Vietnam and Canada can be declared invalid both in whole and in part. Thus, an employment agreement is completely invalid in one of the following cases: (1) the entire content of the employment agreement violates the law, i.e. all provisions of the employment agreement do not comply with the legislation; (2) the person concluding the employment agreement is incompetent or violates the principles of concluding an employment agreement; (3) the work specified in the employment agreement is work prohibited by law; (4) the terms of the employment agreement concluded after the fact significantly change the main terms of the employment offer letter (for example, changes the offer from an indefinite-term agreement to a fixed-term contract, changes the previously offered notice of termination to the statutory minimum, or adds restrictive terms (for example, non-compete); (5) the employee entered into an indefinite-term agreement and then entered into a fixed-term contract; (6) there is ambiguity in the content of the agreement; (6) the content of the agreement does not meet minimum labor standards; (7) the employer will change the existing employment agreement in such a way as to cancel/restrict an existing contractual or general right of the employee (such as benefits, vacation time, or notice of termination). The employment agreement is partially invalid in the part whose content violates the law but does not affect the rest of the contract. The author has discovered that only a court has the right to declare an employment agreement invalid in Vietnam and Canada. If an employment agreement is partially invalid, the employer and the employee are obliged to make amendments and additions to the part of the invalid employment agreement. If an employment agreement is fully invalid due to incompetence or violation of the principles of concluding an employment agreement by the person signing it, the employer and the employee are obliged to re-conclude the employment contract in accordance with the law. If an employment agreement is fully invalid due to the fact that the entire content of the employment agreement contradicts the law or the work provided for by the employment agreement is the work prohibited by law, the employer and the employee must conclude a new employment agreement in accordance with the law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific periodicals of UkraineSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207