Підвищення фінансової безпеки підприємства на основі формування моделі внутрішнього фінансового контролю
Bibliographic record
Abstract
References: \n \n1. Rozporiadzhennia pro vnesennia zmin do Kontseptsii rozvytku derzhavnoho vnutrishnoho finansovoho kontroliu ta zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv shchodo yii realizatsii na period do 2017 roku, 2008 (Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy). [Order on Amendments to the Concept of Development of State Internal Financial Control and Approval of the Plan of Measures for its Implementation for the Period up to 2017, No. 1347. 2008 (Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine).]. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy, [Official Bulletin of Ukraine], 82, 2767. [in Ukrainian]. \n2. Nakaz pro zatverdzhennia Standartiv vnutrishnoho audytu 2011 (Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy). [Order on Approval of Internal Audit Standards 2011 (Ministry of Finance of Ukraine)]. Ofitsiynyy sayt Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy. [The official website of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine]. [in Ukrainian]. (2019, July, 25) \n4. James DeLoach & Jeff Thomson (2014) Improving Organizational Performance and Governance How the COSO Frameworks Can Help. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) [in English]. (2019, July, 24) \n5. Internal Control – Integrated Framework, Executive Summary. [The official website of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Committee (COSO)]. [in English]. (2019, July, 24) \n6. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (1995). Guidance on Control. Toronto, Ontario, Canada : Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. [in English] \n7. Kostenko O. M. (2008). Vnutrishnohospodarskyi kontrol v systemi upravlinnia prybutkovistiu pidpryiemstv [Internal control in the system of enterprise profitability management.]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of ACC], 12, 117–120 [in Ukrainian]. \n8.\tBily`k M. D. (2008). Rol` stabil`noyi diyal`nosti pidpry`yemstv u yix finansovij bezpeci [The Role of Stability of Enterprises in Their Financial Security]. Formuvannya ry`nkovy`x vidnosy`n v Ukrayini [Formation of market relations in Ukraine], 4(83), 129– 133. [in Ukrainian]. \n9. Bilomistna I. I., Xorechko V. Ye. (2012). Mexanizm zabezpechennya finansovoyi bezpeky` promy`slovy`x pidpry`yemstv [The mechanism of financial security of industrial enterprises]. Innovacijna ekonomika. Vseukrayins`ky`j naukovo-vy`robny`chy`j zhurnal [Innovative economy. All-Ukrainian Scientific and Production Magazine], 6 (32), 305–307. [in Ukrainian]. \n10. Aref'yeva O. V., Kuzenko T. B. (2009). Ekonomichni osnovy` formuvannya finansovoyi skladovoyi ekonomichnoyi bezpeky` [Economic fundamentals of the formation of the financial component of economic security]. Aktual`ni problemy` ekonomiky`[Actual problems of economy], 1, 98–103. [in Ukrainian].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".