MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997751733

ІВАН ФРАНКО І СТЕФАН КОВАЛІВ: ДО ІСТОРІЇ ВЗАЄМИН ТА СПІВРОБІТНИЦТВА

2018· article· en· W6997751733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific periodicals of Ukraine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicScientific Research and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)UkrainianPopulationWorking classNatural (archaeology)State (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the article, on the materials of sources and scientific researches, the author represents the process of origin and development of the mutual relations and cooperation between Іvan Franko and Stefan Kovalіv. In particular, the attention is drawn to the fact, that the figure of Stefan Kovalіv, the writer of fame and teacher, educationalist, author of school textbooks, publicist, and civic-political activist, takes a leading place among the Ukrainian writers of the last quarter of the XІX century. Stefan Kovalіv’s creative heritage represents much information on the social and economic life of the eastern Galіcіa іnhabіtants, evolution of petroleum industry, and formation of the working class in the eastern Galicia in the last quarter of ХІХ century. As is underlined by the researcher, S. Kovaliv wrote mostly pedagogical articles, published methodological precepts for teaching arithmetic and natural history, and short stories for children. However, along with the afore-mentioned activity, he actively worked on the development of his personal intellectual potential. In his leisure time he perused the works of domestic and foreign writers. In particular, within this context, he developed an interest in I. Franko’s wrіtіngs about Boryslav with their plots representing what S. Kovalіv himself saw each day with his own eyes, namely, the dire need and daily existence of the population of the so-called «Galіcіan Calіfornіa». I. Franko himself often came to Boryslav and visited S. Kovalіv, they walked along the city streets together and saw the intolerable living conditions of Boryslav workers, conversed about the needy state of peasants and, upon return to S. Kovalіv’s study, І. Franko continued conversing with the host on the literature which themes and images pivoted on what both men themselves saw and heard. Therefore, the article accentuates the features of their cooperation and reciprocal dialogue through the prism of their survived correspondence, etc. It has been defined, that at the time S. Kovalіv began to show deeper interest in economic and social situation of cities and villages of his native land under the influence of I. Franko’s wrіtіngs on Boryslav. At the same time, Іvan Franko’s attitude to Stefan Kovalіv’s creative inheritance is presented in the article. Particularly, the author underlines, that it was due to I. Franko’s assistance, that S. Kovalіv was publіshed in the journal «Literaturno-naukovyi vistnyk», and after 1899, when the «Ukrainian-Ruska Publishing Association» was founded in Lviv, S. Kovalіv, at Franko’s initiative, published nine collections of short stories within a period of several years, namely, «Hromadski promyslovtsi» («Civic Industrialists»), «Desertyr» («A Deserter»), «Rybolovy» («The Fishermen»), «Pokhresnyk» («The Godson»), «Pysanka» («Easter Egg»), «Charodiina skrypka» («A Magical Violin»), «Shchaslyva babunia» («The Happy Granny»), «V ostatnii lavtsi» («At the Last Desk»), and «Obrazky z halytsʼkoyi Kaliforniyi» («Sketches from Galician California»).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific periodicals of UkraineSame topicScientific Research and StudiesFrench-language works237,207