สขภาวะทางจตวญญาณของผดแลผปวยมสลมทปวยเปนมะเรงระยะสดทาย
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to study Spiritual Health of Caregiver in Case of End Stage Cancer Muslim Patients.This qualitative research chosen methodologies of study were ethnography and phenomenology.Study areas were Songklanagarind Hospital, Yensira Patient Building at Kok Nao Temple.Researcher followed participants to their residences which located in Satun, Songkhla, Pattani Yala and Naratiwas to observe phenomenon and to conduct participative and non-participative observation and both informal interview and in-dept interview.Participants of the study were 9 specificallyselected caregivers.The research tools were researcher, demographic data record form, questionnaires about spiritual health and field note record forms developed for data processing.Descriptive analyses were performed for final report.The study finds that caregivers had diversity of behavior during care and study reveals that a situation of end-stage cancer has emotional impacts on caregivers which often affect the relationship between caregivers and patients.The affected emotions resulted in changes of both feeling and behaviors of both patients and the caregivers.This phenomenon has a very complex relation which plays a key role during the crisis phase of life.The results revealed that all caregivers believed that pain and disease was decreed by God or Allah.Despite several problems encountered during the care of the patients, the wills to conduct their duties determinably therefore these had become spiritual strength based on religious studying.The spiritual strength and understanding the phenomenon religiously ultimately reflected good spiritual health of the caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".