MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997922780

主要英语留学生接收国硕士学位学制标准比较研究

2014· article· zh· W6997922780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegree (music)Duration (music)Work (physics)Term (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究采用目的抽樣,以網絡調查為主要研究方法,對主要留學生接收國(美國、英國、澳大利亞與加拿大)接收留學生最多的24所高校的325個碩士學位項目在入學條件、修業年限、課程安排以及學位要求方面的基本特點進行了調查。在此基礎上,對四國被調查各校碩士學位學制進行了比較分析,總結了其在碩士學位學制方面的一般趨勢,進而提出了優化我國碩士階段學制標準、提升我國高等教育國際競爭力的建議。
\nSurveying the profiles of 325 master’s degree programs,this study presents the characteristics of master’s degree programs in the US,UK,Australia,and Canada in terms of admissions, duration of study,curriculum requirements,degree requirements,etc.Recommendations for revising China’s master’s degree programs are made at the end of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it