Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的探讨饮酒与Barrett食管发生的关系。方法系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)等数据库。对纳入研究的文献采用Newcastle-Ottawa量表进行质量评价,根据研究类型、地域、资料来源、饮酒种类分亚组进行分析,综合定量评价饮酒与Barrett食管的关系。结果共纳入16篇文献(病例对照研究13篇,队列研究3篇)累积Barrett食管3 961例,对照11 748例。Meta分析结果显示队列研究亚组中,与不饮酒者相比,饮酒者Barrett食管发病风险OR为1.27(95%CI:1.03～1.58,P=0.03);亚洲地区亚组饮...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it